In 2018 Darlington Borough Council published and consulted upon its Draft Local Plan
which will determine and direct long term investment and growth up to 2036. It is intended to set
out where significant new development should go and ensure the Borough’s needs for housing, a
thriving economy, community facilities and infrastructure are met.
Full details of the Draft Local Plan and its current stage are available
One of the big questions surrounding the Local Plan is the Housing Requirement. The
suggested number of dwellings per year proposed by the Government for Darlington using their housing
requirement methodology is 177. The Draft Local Plan’s minimum requirement was 492 dwelling per
year. The Council has now changed its approach to provide a range for the housing requirement. The
lower minimum requirement figure of 177 dwellings per annum issued by the Government via the
standard method is considered to be a ‘baseline’ figure and will replace the previous minimum figure
of 492. The Council’s higher housing target of 492 dwellings per annum will now be an aspirational
figure to account for the predicted jobs, population and household growth. The target of 492
dwellings per annum is, however, still what the Local Plan will be based upon, not the 177!
The methodology used to determine the ‘aspirational’ 492 figure does not use the
standard methodology as set out by Government, nor is it transparent, indeed it is very confusing.
It does not even consider the potential impact of Brexit. It is ‘aspirational’ and as such there is
a danger that developments approved for housing may only be partially completed and have a
detrimental effect on the future economy of Darlington.
The Local Plan is of great concern to the residents of Whinfield and its surrounding
areas as it includes a proposal for a housing development of 4500 new homes on the edge of
Whinfield. This proposal is referred to in the Draft Local Plan as the Skerningham Strategic
Development. More recently the developers of this site, Theakstons, have applied to the Government
for Garden Village status for this development so it is now referred to as Skerningham Garden
The proposed development of the Skerningham Garden Village will
result in the loss of important recreational facilities such as permissive paths and open spaces which
currently enjoyed and used by many residents. It will also significantly alter the character and nature
what is currently peaceful, green countryside and will have a detrimental effect on the character of the
local area forever.
The Skerningham corridor is also an important habitat for animals, birds and insects and
protects the fragmentation and isolation of wildlife. It is therefore important to keep this green space
as the more we destroy the worse it becomes for urban wildlife.
The Development would also mean the loss of agricultural land and in effect represents
development into our most valued countryside.
Another major concern of the Skerningham Development is the adverse impact it will have
on the current, already full to capacity, highways network within the ward. This will increase safety
concerns for road users and pedestrians alike due to the substantial increase in traffic. Not only that
but one of the proposed access routes cuts across Springfield Park which will result in a loss of
valuable parkland which will not be replaced within this ward and will be to the detriment of our
Included as part of the Skerningham Development is Muscar House Farm, a green open space
situated between Barmpton Lane and the River Skerne. Muscar House Farm also offers valuable amenities to
the residents of Darlington allowing access to the open countryside for recreational walks, an important
facility in promoting health and well-being.
In 2014 Muscar House Farm was included for development in the Council’s Making and
Growing Places Plan, a plan which was subsequently discarded by the Council. The proposed development
attracted an overwhelming volume of objections from residents voicing their concerns, all of which are
still valid to this day. Muscar House Farm has been the subject of proposed development for over 20
years including a judicial review on whether or not it should be developed. The answer then was no, and
the answer today should also be no. The fight to save it, along with other proposed new areas for
development that will impact on the ward will continue.
Elm Tree Farm and the land north of Sparrowhall Drive has also been put forward for
development, albeit there is confusion as to whether or not this is included in the Local Plan as part
of the Skerningham Development, or whether this is a stand alone development outside of the Local Plan.
The developers ‘Bellway’ have argued that this is not part of the Skerningham Development and submitted
a planning application to Darlington Borough Council in October 2018, prior to the Local Plan being
approved. A number of objections were raised with regards to the planning application and its current
status is ‘awaiting decision’. In 1997 a planning application to build 74 houses at Elm Tree Farm was
refused, one of the reasons for this is that it would ‘result in the loss of open land which makes an
important contribution to the character and appearance of the area, provides an important link between
existing open land and development and the open countryside, and provides opportunities for informal
recreation’. Details of the initial proposal submitted for planning can be found
Whinfield Residents Association will keep you updated with all the latest developments
regarding both the Local Plan and the Elm Tree Farm (Land North of Sparrowhall Drive) planning
application so watch this space.